Why don’t cell phones have retractable antennas anymore?

Because today’s electronic devices communicate at frequencies that can be detected by smaller antennas…

The size of a phone’s antenna depends on the carrier frequency used for encoding a communications signal it can detect, explains Lizhong Zheng, of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Research Laboratory of Electronics. “The size of an antenna,” he says, “should be comparable to one wavelength of the carrier frequency.” Wireless signals for radios and cell phones are encoded on a unique wavelength, known as a carrier frequency, that is a periodic oscillation of an electric and magnetic field. It is the controlled modulation of these fields’ amplitudes that carries wireless information.

The metal wire of an antenna is a sort of buoy, marking the flow and ebb of a carrier wave with the relative acceleration of charged electrons. The antenna size should be “big enough to capture some portion of this (wave),” to produce a measurable electrical signal, Zheng notes.

In 1993 the Federal Communications Commission began auctioning off a range of new carrier frequencies to wireless service providers. The first were a range of frequencies close to 900 megahertz, and were typically used by early cordless phones. By the end of the nineties, major providers had acquired many more communications bands, at frequencies greater than 2 gigahertz.

In the early days of cellphones, the wavelength of carrier waves was typically about thirty centimeters, and so the first mobile phones relied on extractable antennas, similar to the ones used in handheld radios. As higher frequencies became available, wireless customers soon started reaping other rewards. A carrier wave with higher frequency allows for faster rates of data encoding and more information capacity, or “bandwidth.” In addition, 2 gigahertz has “different propagation properties” than 900 megahertz, resulting in scattering loss characteristics that make it “suitable for different kinds of applications.”

Today’s carrier frequencies are about three times faster than the old 900 megahertz waves, resulting in minimum antennas sizes that can comfortably fit within the body of a cell phone.

Innovations in antenna design have also pushed the limits of what we are able to do with wireless technology, Zheng adds. “Current laptops have two to four antennas, side by side,” and this “diversity technique” enables up to four times the information capacity for the device. The real breakthrough in the last fifteen years has been the development of signal encoding that collaborates with multiple antennas to decode wireless signals with higher fidelity than ever before, and the diversity technique is fast becoming the industry standard. The cell phone and mobile networking revolution, in large part, is really about the antenna.—Sajan Saini


http://engineering.mit.edu/live/news/1250-why-dont-cell-phones-have-retractable-antennas#1250
http://www.geekologie.com/2007/09/cell_phone_jammer_is_awesome_a.php
http://www.eightiesonline.com/eighties-news-and-information/the-first-cell-phone-call-25-years-ago-in-1983
http://www.esquire.com/style/style-archives-0908


Your feedback is always welcome.
Thank you!
http://www.winncad.com/
http://www.docstoc.com/profile/corona7
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/paul-corona/10/63a/200
http://www.scribd.com/crown%20007
http://www.facebook.com/people/WinnCad-Elements/100001525374479 http://www.youtube.com/user/Winncad

The Cell Phone Jammer Story

Cell Phone Jammer In Action